South Carolina women: Lovers and Fighters
By Sarita, Tuesday, January 4, 2011, 4 commentsI wonder if you can tell where women stand in South Carolina simply by doing a keyword search. Butt in chair. Coffee mug in hand.
After all, if a group of people has an array of words for money, that’s supposed to tell us something, right? Ditto for having lots of words for snow?
What if we flipped the premise. What if we looked at the bills that South Carolina lawmakers have introduced so far with the words "women" or "woman."
I did a keyword search on the S.C. General Assembly site. It didn't yield much.
But to the extent that it did turn up something - about a dozen bills - there was a commemorative license plate for Mary McLeod Bethune, a plan for shuffling various bureaucratic offices, including the S.C. Commission on Women, and a call for including "women and minority members" on a new advisory board for interscholastic athletics.
Another bill proposes a “Purple Heart Day” honoring both "the men and women" who received it.
And two more bills are aimed at preventing women from having abortions. Methods include telling the woman seeking an abortion the gestational age of her fetus and informing her “that anesthetic or analgesic is available to eliminate or alleviate pain to the fetus cause by the particular method of abortion performed or induced.”
Another bill with “woman” in its text says that a woman who has had a caesarean section or suffered an injury from domestic violence should not count those as pre-existing conditions when seeking insurance.
Then there’s the bill that creates a pilot program to give certain Medicaid recipients around-the-clock in-home care. The program is supposed to save money that otherwise gushes out when a Medicaid recipients goes to the emergency room for a bad case of indigestion. "Pregnant women in their third trimester," seniors 65+ and parents with infants would be given priority.
OK - so it all adds up to what, exactly? We see women chiefly as mothers and mothers-to-be? But we will salute them if they receive a Purple Heart in battle?


















4 Comments
Interesting and informative
Sadly, I think people check in with their 401k more often than they check in with their legislators work and progress after an election. I followed your lead and went to the state gov. site to do a search too and got excited to see a return for the Commission on Women (apparently they were transferred to a different department) then I went to the site to learn more...
"Established in 1971, the South Carolina Commission on Women (the SCCW) has the mission and purpose to improve and promote the quality of life and the status of women in South Carolina. Under this charge, the Commission advises the Governor and the Legislature on matters related to the needs of women in South Carolina."
Sadly again, the nomination form is from 2008 for the Women of Achievement award and the "current projects" have a "please check back soon" banner.
Clearly, there is more work that needs to be done.
Sometimes I think that's
Sometimes I think that's exactly what it comes to Sarita... unfortunately.
Web sites can be so telling
Heather gave a perfect example:
"... the nomination form is from 2008 for the Women of Achievement award and the "current projects" have a "please check back soon" banner. "
State Stastistics ...
S.C. doesnt look very good when it comes to many issues for women and children-seems ironic because we have alot of smart people in our state-thank god for our new gov-elect!
Deb
Participate More