blogger profileblogger profile
Thatcoolbroad
writer
I'm just a regular gal striving to become "that cool broad." Am I on the right track? Or am I certifiable? You be the judge....
blog entryblog entry

Are fashion magazines the devil?

Wednesday, May, 14, 2008

Who isn’t subject to little body image angst, right? Well, according to an article in the most recent issue of Ms. Magazine, body image issues among young women and girls are on the rise and mass media is to blame.

In the article, Caroline Heldman, assistant professor of politics at Occidental College, writes that low self-esteem and unhealthy body perceptions are often side effects of self-objectification (when we view our bodies as an object to be consumed by others - usually, men). And though the tendency to self-objectify has been around for a while, Heldman argues that the increasingly provocative mass media, which bombards women with images of female bodies shown as outright objects, is feeding the trend and it’s reaching even our youngest girls. The average American is exposed to 3000 to 5000 advertisements a day (many sexually charged) – up from 500 to 2000 a day in the 70’s, and girls as young as 7 years-old are exposed to clothing, toys, music, magazines and television programs that encourage them to be sexy or “hot”.

Heldman states that this onslaught of objectifying images often times leads to increased self-objectification, and those who self-objectify are more prone to depression, low self-esteem and have less faith in their own capabilities. It can also result in decreased cognitive functioning, poorer academic performance and motor skills, and cause girls to view themselves as powerless sexual objects. Kenyon College psychology professor Sara Murnen concurs with Heldman’s findings and adds that girls “are taught to view their bodies as ‘projects’ that need work before they can attract others, whereas boys are likely to learn to view their bodies as tools to use to master the environment.”

The most interesting way Heldman suggests to combat the tendency to self-objectify is to avoid media that compels us to do so. Even by the author’s admission, that’s a tough one because that basically rules out a majority of the movies, TV shows and magazines out there. However, her research with college-age women indicates that “the less women consume media, the less they self-objectify, particularly if they avoid fashion magazines. By shutting out media, girls and women can create mental and emotional space for true exploration.”

What do you think? Can you give up your trusty fashion magazines? Do you think seeing airbrushed picture after airbrushed picture has an effect on the way you view yourself? I wonder if we started consuming less and creating more, we'd start viewing ourselves as tools to master the universe.
NV
NV
Posted Wed, 05/14/2008 - 19:04
I’m a fashion fan, and admittedly, the industry likes glamour, exceptionally beautiful women and occasional trips to fantasy land. As consumers we have to remember that those women are touched up/air-brushed, beauty comes in a variety of shapes, sizes and colors, and that we should dictate who and what we’d like to see in magazines. If less consumption is the only way, so be it. Regardless of media and fashion magazines, if grown women lack positive self-esteem that’s likely to be passed on to young women and girls - so we all have to be committed to the need for change. BTW, you're definitely "that cool broad" : )
Janie
Janie
Posted Wed, 05/14/2008 - 20:31
I really buy fashion magazines to look at shoes and handbags. Seriously, I also think you bring up some important points. I worry about effect on the youngin's more than myself. These kinds of messages seem to subliminally be pushing our girls to grow up so quickly before they have the mental maturity and the confidence to really make good decisions.
Pamela Munro
Pamela Munro
Posted Thu, 05/15/2008 - 16:16
Since there is so much fashion info gratis on the net, I rarely indulge in fashion mags & only look at them in waiting rooms! One tips one's hat to fashion not to look too dowdy - but the rest is dressing for you & your type. I know how to dress me better than almost anybody.
alison skirtboston
alison skirtboston
Posted Fri, 05/16/2008 - 06:19
This is an issue I've obsessed about since my first daughter was born 18 years ago (three others followed). The media seems to be the big culprit, but parents also have to consider how they act, what they talk about and how they appear, too. I believe that teaching by example is so important -- I surprised myself by giving up dieting, refusing to talk about being "fat" and not comparing myself to others (in appearance). We talk frequently about the merits of chasing someone else's "ideal." And the magazines and demeaning TV shows and movies have not been part of their lives. It's possible to raise well-adjusted kids with positive self-images.
Sara Conrad
Sara Conrad
Posted Fri, 05/16/2008 - 13:58
I'm right there with you for creating more. But, I think it's important not to avoid media--shutting oneself out can be damaging, too. Actually, I think expanding one's media consumption to different points of view (such as Ms. Mag) is really important. If you shut out the toxic, you also shut out the nutritious info. I don't think fashion mags are to blame--in fact, fashion is a means of artistic expression just as painting or writing. I think how women are seen is something that needs to be dealt with in society's greater subconciousness(however that may be done, ha!)-- before it isn't reflected and imitated in the media. Pointing fingers at the media is like shooting the messenger. People respond to media that interests them...I have too much to say. I'm responding via blog! :)~Sara