Roadmaps from my Current State
By Ginger, Monday, October 6, 2008, 2 commentsI’m talking to a friend of mine the other day, and he’s telling me how he just broke up with his partner of eight years. I asked him why. He said his partner hadn’t had a real job in about five years; that he didn’t look for work anymore and he didn’t pay rent or even half of the bills. He did take care of the lawn, but that left at least 39 working hours left in the week. The boyfriend (well, ex-boyfriend) was also good at hanging artwork, which, as my friend looked around the newly bared walls, will be sorely missed. I asked my friend how long he had wanted to break up with his partner before he actually did. He told me six years. That’s right. They were together eight years – two of them happy ones.
Now, many of you might be saying, “Wow! What took you so long?” Me, I totally understand. Like Neil Sedaka sang in the 70s, “Breaking Up Is Hard To Do.”
I was married for 13 years. My husband and I were in therapy for 14 years. I thought about breaking up for 12 years. I had my friend beat by 100 percent.
Still, my friend seemed relieved and hopeful about the future; glad to be moving on with his life. In fact, he was heading to
So naturally (please note sarcasm) my friend told his ex that since he would be away for the weekend, he (the ex) could stay at “the old house.” The old house being the one that took my friend a solid month to extricate his boyfriend from in the first place. In fact, the ex had only been gone just over a week. My friend finally got him to take his clothes and personal items just the day before, and the artwork was down but still leaning against the walls. So now my friend has invited him back to “the old house” for a weekend? Call me crazy, but I could see the writing on the wall, and it was spelled E-N-A-B-L-E-R.
The only way I so readily recognized this ailment is that, along with the title of being Queen of Denial, I am also a world-class enabler. Shit, my friend taking just six years to break up has me beat by half. (Check out Skirt Blogger “Suzq” http://skirt.com/user/8530for more real life from enablers)!
So I gently (well, maybe passionately would be a better word) suggest to my friend that maybe inviting his ex back to “the old house” is not such a good idea. Maybe he will never leave again, I say. Maybe it would be better to take a tough love stance. My friend is horrified. “I can’t just let him live on the streets!” he says. “I have to do the right thing!”
This is classic co-dependent language. I should know; I’m fluent in it. I tell my friend, “Well, actually, yes, you can let him live on the street or figure out a way not to. Did you ever think that not helping him this time would be the very best way to help him?” The only thing is, not helping doesn’t feel as good...
See, the thing about our side of the co-dependent equation is that we get to feel HELPFUL. GOOD. POWERFUL. Our dependents’ inabilities feed our abilities. That’s why when a person who needs saving hooks up with a person who likes to save, it feels like magic. Really. It feels like love and soulmating and forever. But it’s not. The magic fades. Because inevitably someone grows up – let’s say it’s the savior. If the savee continues needing to be saved, it gets old. You eventually want the person to get a job or pay the rent or stand up for themselves or stop drinking or whatever. And they don’t. And they get mad. Because you are changing the deal. You are refusing to enable. How dare you.
And one more thing: it is hard to have an intimate relationship with Mother Teresa. Or Jesus. Or any savior or mother (or father) figure, for that matter. (And vice-versa). So, super-saver, all that power we feel? It adds to the fizzling of the relationship, too.
I tell all this to my friend, but I have to do it fast, because his ex is literally on his way to the house as my friend is heading to the airport for his trip. He nods. He thinks. He really gets it and he’s suddenly hyper-bummed that I didn’t have this conversation with him a few hours ago, before he agreed to the return of the roommate.
But he promises me he’ll do better next time. He says he’ll call from
“I’ll get him an apartment somewhere … I’ll co-sign the lease … I’ll give him a few months’ rent… then he won’t be on the streets AND he won’t be here! He’ll have to start paying his own rent and for that he’ll need a job and this will be great!”
Ah, my friend is brilliant. He’s hopeful. He’s delusional.
And I should know. Delusional is step two in the co-dependent-anonymous program. After four years, I myself am only on, like, step 6. ’d be further along, but I’ve had to stop a few times to help some other folks climb up the 12 steps. I might have to go back to step one…



















2 Comments
great post
(Laughing) The situation is
Participate More